1) THE PRESIDENT'S CORNER (by Tom Steichen)
This
month's random bits and pieces (Article 1) starts with a comparison piece between the
recent US and Austrian elections... we are politically alike in many ways yet different in some. We follow that
somewhat long piece with two short bits courtesy of Patrick Kovacs. The first concerns Lutheran records, those
being digitalized by the Superintendency and some "hidden" FamilySearch records first found by Christian
Ofenböck. Patrick's second bit lists upcoming events in Burgenland and Vienna, something he says gets asked about
frequently on the BB Facebook page. I follow that with the latest news around asylum seekers in
Burgenland... should seekers do community service to earn financial assistance? My next bit concerns what I've
called the "subtleties of language." Why does GoogleTranslate translate two different titles to the exact
same thing? ...yet the entities involved want to change from one title to the other! My penultimate bit is about
"poor" Burgenland... the news is it's not! My final bit is about thatched reed roofs in Burgenland... might they
make a comeback?
Our regular tidbits include the monthly BB Facebook report, book sales, and some
Words for Thought ...that are related to my first bit!
We conclude with our standard sections: A Historical BB Newsletter article, Ethnic Events and
Emigrant Obituaries.
Comparing and Contrasting the US and Austrian Elections: I'm going to write a little bit about the
2024 election results in the US and Austria. As such, I will be expressing a few personal opinions and
interpretations. Please do not attack me for how I see things, as I am not denigrating differing views or trying
to claim any high ground for my opinions (about either election).
I'll start out by saying that the US election is yet another recent election around the world that
tilted right (in a political sense), similar to what the Austrian election did a few months ago and
the European Union election did a few months before that. In the US, the Republican party won the Presidency (60%
of the electoral vote [but by only 1.6% of the popular vote]), the Senate (53 of 100 seats), and the House of
Representatives (a lead of 6 among 435 seats [220-214] with 1 still undecided [but leaning Democrat]). This, by US
political standards, represents a convincing victory, but the reality is the margin of victory at the national
level was comparatively small, as it is in most elections.
However, if one were to map election results by county, it becomes apparent that Democrats generally
dominate the big cities and their immediate suburbs, while the Republicans dominate exurbs and rural areas. This
election was not different from this basic behavior, other than the Republican party making small gains almost
everywhere, including in most Democrat enclaves.
The map (below left) shows a by-county breakout of 2024 Republican-won counties (in red) versus
Democrat-won counties (in blue). This was created on Truth Social early after the election but was quickly
fact-checked by an independent organization, which found 3 possible errors / differences out of the more than
3,100 counties (resulting in one extra red county at the time of the review); the map also failed to include
Alaska (likely very red) and Hawaii (likely very blue). While I'm sure it will change a little as final votes are
counted, I'm also sure it will not change enough to reject the basic big city (Democrat) vs. rural (Republican)
theory.
To compare to Austria, it is necessary to know where the major Austrian political parties fall in a
political spectrum. The chart (above right) shows that the FPÖ and ÖVP are on the Conservative
(right) side of the spectrum, whereas the other main party, the SPÖ, and the two smaller seated parties are on the
Liberal (left) side of the spectrum. We also can see that the SPÖ and Grüne (Green) parties are
Socialist-leaning while the other 3 are Capitalist-leaning.
In the recent Austrian national election, the right-wing FPÖ and ÖVP garnered over 55% of the vote, led by the
far-right FPÖ. The three seated left-wing parties earned less than 39% of the vote between them. Further, all
Austrian states except Vienna were led in votes by either the FPÖ or ÖVP. Vienna was the only state to give the
SPÖ a plurality; it reversed the overall voting giving 54% of its vote to the seated left-wing parties and only
38% to the right-wing parties. In this regard, Austria behaves quite similar to the US:
liberal-leaning in the big cities, conservative-leaning in the more rural areas.
For completeness, below are the votes for each party in each Austrian state, presented as percent of the vote. The
plurality-winning party in each state is highlighted in their color.
State |
FPÖ |
ÖVP |
SPÖ |
NEOS |
Grüne |
Others |
Carinthia |
38.4 |
20.8 |
23.1 |
7.8 |
4.7 |
5.2 |
Styria |
32.2 |
27 |
18.6 |
8.2 |
7.6 |
6.4 |
Upper Austria |
30.5 |
26.3 |
20.3 |
8.3 |
8.4 |
6.2 |
Lower Austria |
29.2 |
29.9 |
20.2 |
8.5 |
6.7 |
5.5 |
Burgenland |
28.8 |
28.6 |
27 |
6.5 |
4.7 |
4.4 |
Tyrol |
28.7 |
31 |
15.4 |
10.6 |
8.1 |
6.2 |
Salzburg |
27.7 |
31.6 |
16.8 |
9 |
8.5 |
6.4 |
Vorarlberg |
27.1 |
29.1 |
13.1 |
12.6 |
11.4 |
6.7 |
Vienna |
20.7 |
17.4 |
29.9 |
11.4 |
12.3 |
8.3 |
Austria |
28.8 |
26.3 |
21.1 |
9.1 |
8.2 |
6.4 |
To understand the vote better, I now want to switch to demographic characteristics, specifically
gender and age. I'll start with Austria and show the results of a poll presented by Statista, a global
database company founded in Germany in 2007 with slogan "Empowering People with Data." They surveyed 1,248 voters
in the days leading up to the election and report the following percentages (each column adds up to 100%):
Party |
Men |
Women |
16-34 |
35-59 |
60+ |
FPÖ |
29 |
28 |
27 |
37 |
22 |
ÖVP |
28 |
24 |
20 |
19 |
38 |
SPÖ |
19 |
23 |
18 |
20 |
24 |
NEOS |
10 |
8 |
14 |
11 |
4 |
Grüne |
7 |
9 |
9 |
7 |
8 |
KPÖ |
3 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
Beer |
2 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
Other |
2 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
The far-right FPÖ drew the greatest percentage
of both men and women, with the center-right ÖVP coming in second for both genders, giving the right 57% of
men and 52% of women. The third-place center-left SPÖ drew slightly more support from women than from men,
as did the Grüne party. However the seated left-wing parties drew support from only 36% of men and 40% of
women (7% of men and 8% of women preferred unseated parties). |
I want to take a moment to note that these gender differences are both consistent yet inconsistent with modern
Austrian voting behavior. A 2020 paper by Monika Köppl-Turyna looked at actual ballot data collected in the
Austrian state of Vienna for the years 1954 to 1991 and confirmed previously published survey data results.
She reported that ballot data showed that the traditional Austrian gender gap of males more
left-leaning existed up to 1969 and then changed into the modern gender gap of females more left-leaning. She also
confirmed survey-based findings that male voters support more extreme positions than female voters. The
2024 election results show females did vote mildly more leftist overall and that they voted far-right in
essentially equal proportion to men plus slightly more far-left than men, so unusually extreme on the "extremist"
scale.
When considering age groups, again the far-right FPÖ drew the higher percentages in the young and
middle-ages groups, with the 60+ voters preferring the center-right ÖVP. Do note that 16-year-olds can vote in
Austria. These results indicate a wide spectrum of current support in Austria for a right-wing agenda.
In the US election, support for the right (Republicans) was stronger among men (54%) than among
women (46%), with nearly opposite support percentages for the left (Democrats): men (44%) women (53%). These US
gender-based differences (8 and 7%) in party/wing preference were noticeably greater than among Austrian voters (5
and 4%).
The available age data for the US election reports different age categories than the available
Austrian data... still, I think it shows a pattern that is distinct from and dissimilar to the Austrian data.
Disregarding gender (see table on left below), the young and young middle-age voters lean left (Democrat) while
the older middle-age voters lean right (Republican) and the oldest voters are neutral.
Percent of Voters (both tables) |
|
Women |
Men |
Age |
Dem |
Rep |
|
Age |
Dem |
Rep |
Dem |
Rep |
18-29 |
54 |
43 |
|
18-29 |
63 |
36 |
49 |
47 |
30-44 |
49 |
48 |
|
30-44 |
56 |
41 |
45 |
51 |
45-64 |
44 |
54 |
|
45-64 |
50 |
48 |
40 |
59 |
65+ |
49 |
49 |
|
65+ |
54 |
45 |
44 |
54 |
However, when we include gender (right table above), we see US women consistently lean left politically while
all but the youngest age group in men lean right. The data in the left table comes from an exit poll of 22,509
voters carried out by Edison Research/NEP and reported via Reuters. The data in the right table is from a
different exit poll of 15,590 voters reported by Statista.
As a last part of this bit, I want to talk about perception issues. In previous newsletters, I have
reported that none of the other Austrian political parties are willing to form a coalition national government
with the plurality-winning far-right FPÖ. This is driven in large part by the leader of the FPÖ, Herbert Kickl,
who many fear may be a second coming of Viktor Orban, an authoritarian autocrat who calls the Hungarian government
he has led for 14 years an "illiberal democracy." Although Orban initially took office via a free election, his
manipulation of the rule of law and a rewrite of the Hungarian constitution has kept him there (and likely will
keep him there until he retires or dies). His foreign policy has been largely anti-EU and pro-Putin.
Returning to Austria, the center-right ÖVP stands close to the far-right FPÖ on economic and migration issues, but
it aligns far better with the center-left SPÖ and NEOS regarding the rule of law and foreign policy. Thus these
parties reject Kickl as they fear he may mimic Orban.
In the US, left-wing voices (and a few centrist-right voices) have already spoken out on "stopping Trump." They
raise questions about whether Trump will follow the rule of law and whether he is too pro-Putin. So in this
respect, we may have another similarity between the Austrian and US elections (although the anti-Trump sentiment
in the US seems not as universal as the anti-Kickl sentiment in Austria).
I'll end by talking a bit about the SPÖ "failure" in the recent Austrian federal election (third
place overall). I'll also remind you that I talk more about the SPÖ than other Austrian parties because Burgenland
has a majority (sole-party) SPÖ state government. Despite this state government, the SPÖ came in third in the
federal election among Burgenland voters too. So why third place in both Austria and Burgenland?
As you may recall, the federal SPÖ has experienced weakening appeal to voters beginning some 30 years ago. The FPÖ
(insignificant before 1990) has steadily grown and new far-left parties continue to bleed off some SPÖ voters. As
a result the SPÖ has not led the Austrian federal government since the 2013 election (after being the dominant
party in 15 of the 19 prior elections). A year ago, this led to the ouster of then SPÖ party leader, Pamela
Rendi-Wagner, a traditional center-left politician, being a physician, environmentalist, feminist and trade
unionist.
The replacement was Andreas Babler, a man who has since self-identified as a Marxist with interests predominantly
in trade unions and labor struggles. His is what has been called a "materialistic" center-left party, one that
dismisses “stupid identity politics” and is largely uninterested in typical-leftist feminist, migration, and
ecological causes. His electoral program was publicly denounced by other SPÖ party leaders as unserious and out of
touch with the 21st century. Not surprisingly, it failed to gain traction beyond his immediate party base and
likely caused part of the SPÖ base to switch to the smaller further-left parties. No wonder it was last among the
three major parties. In Burgenland, there likely was the added motive to snub Babler because he had beaten out
Burgenland's Doskozil for the role of party leader.
Contrast that with the US Democrat agenda centered around the feminist, migration, and ecological causes that
Babler ignored and a party tagged by the Republicans for supporting "identity politics" (whether they thought they
did or not). Further, there was lingering damage from Hilary Clinton's "deplorables" comment and from Biden's
recent "garbage" comment leading to a party that Bernie Sanders has since claimed has abandoned working class
people so "should not be surprised that the working class has abandoned them." Effectively, there was
almost no similarities between the leftist Austrian SPÖ agenda and the leftist US Democrat agenda...
but the outcome was the same.
This then takes me full circle to where I started... both countries were caught up in the tilt right
phenomenon that has dominated world-wide politics over the last few years in developed nations. While it
is clear that this phenomenon is happening, reasons for it are less clear. Still, I can't help but think that
perceived economic conditions (inflation, budget deficits) and observed worsening personal financial situations
for many in both Europe and the US, along with concerns about excess migration and an associated loss of perceived
national sovereign power, have led both countries to the right in a hope of reversing these trends, rejecting the
incumbents along the way... but that is just a reasoned personal opinion.
I'll state one more opinion, but one related to what I said in the prior paragraph: I don't think the Republicans
won the US Presidential election because of Trump nor that the Democrats lost because of Harris... I think the
party platforms were the deciding factor, and that the Republicans may have won in spite of Trump. To me,
the Republican majority wins in the House and Senate support my belief that party platform was decisive.
If you have a reasoned personal opinion about, or any thoughts on, aspects of either election that you would like
to share with the BB community, please write. As long as it does not attack anyone, I'll be glad to share it with
the group.
Lutheran Record Images: Patrick Kovacs passed along two pieces of information concerning online
Lutheran church records. First, he reports that "according to Mag. Dr. Christa Grabenhofer, the curator for the
Lutheran Church in Burgenland, the digitalization of the books has been completed. They're now in a review process
(I guess to determine whether all pages are accounted for), and publication by year's end is still on track."
Secondly, he reports that "member Christian Ofenböck has found a "hidden collection" of Lutheran records on
FamilySearch." He calls them hidden because, although they are indexed so individual records can be found, the
collections are not listed in the FamilySearch catalog (meaning, say, if you look for Kukmirn in the
catalog, the involved dataset will not appear there nor under a generic "Lutheran church records" heading).
Thus he says it is hard to tell what is there.
He notes he has found mostly "hidden" death records from the 1930s until 1991, and for Oberschützen (one of his
ancestral villages) some birth records before 1828 and after 1920, and some marriage records before 1828. He gave
the following links for some of the record collections he has found:
Kukmirn Deaths 1945-1991
Markt Allhau Deaths 1944-1991
Nickelsdorf Deaths 1943-1991
Pöttelsdorf Births 1834-1900
Pöttelsdorf Births 1901-1911
Pinkafeld Deaths 1950-1991
Rotenturm Deaths 1942-1991
Zurndorf Deaths 1783-1919
Oberschützen Deaths 1783-1829
I invite you to notify me should you discover some uncataloged records or record sets (collections) for your
ancestral villages... that is, records or record sets on FamilySearch from before 1828 or from after 1920
(almost all cataloged record sets for Burgenland on FamilySearch are in the ~1828 to 1920 era, so anything
outside this era is what we are most interested in). Even if you can't figure out the record set number, let me
know what you found and I'll try to discover the link to the collection.
While I have not done so yet, I will be adding the above links to the BB FamilySearch page.
PS: Patrick sent me another note late in this month with more Lutheran record sets of the above nature, plus a
transcription of one of them. I will list the record sets below (but will not yet report on the transcription, as
I have too little time due to Thanksgiving holiday activities). FYI, it appears this second list includes all the
record sets listed above:
Events in Vienna and Burgenland: Patrick also wrote to say they often get questions on Facebook
about the best time to travel to Austria and Burgenland? His implied answer was around "some major (well at
least for our standards) events throughout the year in Vienna and Burgenland," and he said the following
events have a date fixed for next year:
► Vienna Steiermark Dorf 27-30 March
► Wine Spring Deutsch Schützen/Eisenberg 2-3 May
► Vienna Burgenland Kul(t)inarium 20-23 May
► Vienna Film Festival 28 June - 31 August
► Redwine Festival Deutschkreutz 10-13 July
► Red Summer Wine Neckenmarkt 14-16. August
► Vienna Kaiser Wiesn 25 Sep - 12 Oct (sort of a miniature Oktoberfest)
Asylum Assistance and Community Service: In a previous newsletter, I mentioned that the Austrian
federal government added an obligation in July requiring asylum seekers to do charitable work in order to receive
financial support via the nation's "basic care" service. At the time, the federal government stated that the
individual Austrian states could decide for themselves whether they wish to add a similar obligation in order to
receive financial support from their state's "basic care" funds.
In response, Burgenland has prepared an amendment to their asylum law to require community service, and it will be
voted on in the state parliament in December. Previously, the state government established an upper limit of 330
people who can receive basic care support at the same time. When announcing the pending vote, Governor Doskozil
said, "Migration must be financially and socially sustainable, that is a question of justice."
If the amendment passes, the basic provision for asylum seekers who are able to work will be linked to charitable
work. The announcement went on to say that anyone who refuses job offers twice will no longer receive benefits
from the basic supply. In the event of a negative asylum decision, the benefits from the basic provision are
automatically discontinued with one month's notice, but there will be a one-time "return assistance."
Doskozil is sticking to his demand for an upper limit of 10,000 asylum applications per year for Austria,
claiming Burgenland is "making advance payments" here, as it is particularly affected by "uncontrolled migration"
as a border region. That is, he believes it is being forced to host and pay for an unfair share of asylum seekers
while their applications are being assessed.
The Austrian Ministry of the Interior said that around 140 asylum seekers had been assigned to Burgenland for
basic care this year, meaning about 250 are currently in basic care there.
The Subtleties of Language: I've never been trained in the German language. What I know of the
language, I've learned on my own because of my studies into genealogy and family history. So, if it is German
words related to births, marriages, deaths, occupations, illnesses and other things of this ilk, I probably know
or will recognize the words (likewise, I know a lot of Hungarian words for these same things). And yes, I can put
together simple German sentences (but do not ask me to get the gender of nouns correct!) and also yes, I
have expanded my vocabulary a little into other areas over the years. Most certainly, however, do not ask
me to speak German, as I pronounce everything as if they are English words or letters... and that
makes my utterances mostly unintelligible! So, when I saw the following sentence in a news article, I resorted to
GoogleTranslate:
Aus der „Fachhochschule Burgenland“ wird die „Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Burgenland.“
Now I know Hochschule is University (but I must consciously not translate it to High
School, a temptation because of my native language!) and Wissenschaft is Science, so adding an -en
must make is Sciences. Der and die are forms of the (but I seldom know which version
to use). What else? Aus is from or out of, and für is for or of, and of
course I know Burgenland. So that leaves wird, Fach and Angewandte... and bafflement
as to what exactly this says! Thus to GoogleTranslate, which yields:
The “University of Applied Sciences Burgenland” becomes the “University of Applied Sciences Burgenland.”
And yes, I reported that to you correctly! Whoa! Right?
Now I was fine with the machine translation of wird to becomes, but GoogleTranslate insisted
the two sections quoted above translate to the same thing! So I resorted to my Langenscheidt Encyclopedic
Dictionary for translations of my missing words:
Fachhochschule: specialized institution of higher learning; professional school.
Angewandte: applied.
So Angewandte Wissenschaften is Applied Sciences and the new name makes good sense: University
of Applied Sciences Burgenland.
But how did Fachhochschule become University of Applied Sciences too?
Here is my speculation: My translating dictionary was last revised in 1974... but language constantly
changes and I suspect the old meaning of Fachhochschule has evolved to (nearly) exclusively (or preferably)
mean a professional school for applied sciences, whereas, other professional schools took on other, more
occupation-specific names.
Regardless, there was an Austrian law amendment in July that allowed Fachhochschulen to rename themselves
Hochschulen für Angewandte Wissenschaften, a name form that is said to be more understandable and more
comparable to other such institutions in the world.
However, I think my Langenscheidt gives another hint as to why such a school might wish to change its name.
This translating dictionary gives the phrase, Fachhochschule idiot, which it says is colloquial,
contempt, meaning one-track specialist.
The schools themselves, however, will note that Fachhochschulen have developed enormously with a broad
range of courses and greatly expanded areas of research and training. Point in fact, the Burgenland University
of Applied Sciences currently offers a total of 15 Bachelor's and 13 Master's degree programs as well as a
further 40 university courses, so why not credit it for what it has become?
Purchasing Power of Burgenländers: I'm sure you are aware that a key reason for the high emigration
rate from the Burgenland area was how poor the people were. Even when Burgenland became part of Austria, it
entered as its poorest province (and remained so for many years). Things have changed, however.
A recent study by the OGM-Institute (Austrian Society for Marketing Corporation) shows that real purchasing power
in Burgenland is now around five percent above the Austrian average, and only Lower Austria has a greater
value. Further, Burgenland's improved purchasing power is a result of rising incomes coupled with a low cost of
living. Burgenland has moved up to fifth place in per capita income among the nine provinces of Austria, with
women earning well in comparison to those of other provinces, while maintaining the lowest cost of living.
According to the OGM researcher, this upswing is a consequence of the extensive subsidies to Burgenland from the
EU after Austria joined the EU in 1995 and benefits from the fall of the Iron Curtain, which moved it from a
peripheral location in Europe toward its center. Influx (of both affluent people and earnings) from Vienna is also
a factor, especially in northern Burgenland, giving the district of Eisenstadt-Umgebung the highest purchasing
power in Burgenland. Further, while there remains a north-south divide, it is much less pronounced today than it
used to be.
Governor Doskozil was quick to claim that the strong purchasing power and higher incomes are the result of "consistent
regional development and clever investments" while the opposition FPÖ argues that the "much-vaunted
purchasing power is not generated to a considerable extent here, but in the neighboring provinces such as Vienna,
Lower Austria and Styria." Regardless, Burgenländers are apparently doing well.
Could Thatched Reed Roofs Make a Come-back in Burgenland? While I do not know the
exact legal status of thatched reed roofs in Burgenland, my impression is that they have largely been banned in
new construction by villages for many years. The main problem with them, of course, was that in a time when whole
villages had thatched roofs and houses were sited close together, if one rooftop burned, the whole village could
burn. These roofs were threatened externally by blowing embers and also internally, as there often was no
protection from a rising ember.
Reed roofs were desirable in Burgenland because they had excellent insulating qualities (both for heat and sound)
due to the hollow nature of each reed, and their availability and low cost due to the large reed beds in the
Neusiedlersee (whereas alternatives were often unavailable or expensive). In modern times, reeds also are
recognized as a renewable resource and for net sequestering carbon rather than net releasing it, as is true for
production of most alternative roofing materials. These features mean that reeds remain viable in modern times as
wall insulation material, where they can be encased in less flammable materials.
Well, with all that for prologue, I'll report that a new reed-roofed, wood-construction detached single-family
home in Weiden am See won the "Builder's Award" this year. But it wasn't without a fight!
The
homeowner said it took two years to convince local authorities that his planned home wouldn't be a fire hazard.
Eventually, he even had to build a model thatched-roof house and set it on fire to demonstrate its burning
characteristics.
It turns out that the traditional thatched roofs were such a fire hazard because of the largely open area under
the reeds, allowing for air to suck up from below in the event of a fire, which led to sudden flashover of the
roof and blowing embers. The new design has an impermeable layer right below the reeds, blocking air from feeding
a fire from below. Without this rising air, the tight-packed reeds burn slowly and essentially "dissolve" in
place. Other aspects of modern construction (new heating and cooking systems, full room ceilings, etc.) reduce or
eliminate starting the roof on fire from inside the house.
The homeowner, Jacobus van Hoorne, was a strong proponent for a thatched roof house because he is a reed cutter,
roofer and builder. The house itself, designed by a Viennese architect, is a modern timber building with an
S-shaped floor plan and a strongly sloping roof that the architect says "is progressive because it's very
ecological. It shows the qualities and possibilities of the reeds."
The "Builder's Award" jury called the house "architecturally exciting, but also sustainable and
forward-looking." A properly-constructed reed roof should last 40 years, is a natural raw material with great
insulating properties, is easily recyclable when it must be replaced, and has a negligible carbon footprint.
Sounds like a win for nature (and for the homeowner, business wise!).
The
Facebook Bunch (from Vanessa Sandhu):
Greetings, Burgenland Bunch!
I hope that everyone had a nice Thanksgiving celebration. As we move towards the holiday season, we will have lots
of great seasonal content to share in our group (now 2270 members with 21 added last month). Stop by and check us
out! We have lots of recipes, music, and conversations about our families’ Burgenland traditions. We at the BB
wish those who celebrate a very Merry Christmas and a Happy Hanukkah!
Find us here: facebook.com/share/.
Member Steve Huber shared a nice video (youtu.be/WhBg30EcCTs)
featuring the winemaking Krutzler family of Deutsch Schützen. Their winemaking dynasty spans many generations and
has yielded several exceptional wines that have been critically acclaimed by many. Steve also shared a nice
tribute to Joe “Butch” Weber of the Joe Weber Orchestra. Joe was an extremely talented musician who helped
keep our Burgenland music alive in the Lehigh Valley for his entire career. Please enjoy some of his beautiful
music here: “Hallo Ihr Freunde”:
youtube.com/watch?v=6tzAFU0GYWw.
Member Brigitte Kurtz shared some beautiful photos of Kroatisch Ehrensdorf.
Member AJ Cajta shared a nice photo of the Kriegdenkmal Schachendorf.
New member John K. Fabsits shared a great photo of himself standing next to the sign for the
village of Stinatz. The photo is from his first trip to Austria to commemorate the 100th anniversary of his
grandfather’s immigration to the United States.
Member Manuel Wukicsevics shared a fantastic resource for those researching Heugraben. He created an
Excel file containing all of the births/baptisms, marriages and deaths in Heugraben from the years 1738-1934.
Thank you for all of your hard work, Manuel! It is greatly appreciated!
BB Staff member Terry Horace McWilliams shared lots of great photos of the gathering of Burgenland
descendants held this month in St. Louis. She writes “We had a wonderful Gathering of Burgenland Descendants in
St. Louis this past Sunday! It is so fun making connections and celebrating our heritage. We even had a surprise
visit from the Motts who are currently on assignment with Familysearch.org in St. Louis. Joe Mott is a
Burgenland descendant. They were notified of the gathering by their daughter who lives in Alaska and reads the BB
Newsletter.”
CONNECTIONS
Member Jan Harrison writes “Researching my great aunt's father's side. Anyone researching the
Ohr family in what is now Markt Allhau in the Burgenland? The families lived in Alho, houses 75 and 205. Her
dad Josef Ohr was born on 1893 in house 205 and married to Elizabeth Ritter. My great aunt can't do the research
because her vision is fading. Thank you. Found out three children were born in house 204 and my aunt's father was
born in 205, next door. They were peasants, not landowners. And surprise, my aunt's grandfather did not inherit
house 75, his sister did. Still need to see if she was taking care of her parents.”
Member Brien Vokits writes “Can anyone help with a dead end? I’m looking for parents, spouse,
siblings, children of Stefan Vukits (Wukits), born 19 Oct 1914, in Schachendorf, Burgenland and killed in
military action on the Russian front, 15 Sep 1942, Romanowo/14 Km Nordostw Sytschewka. There is a freestanding
memorial in his honor on the way to Durnbach. He should not be confused with Stefan Vukits, born 20 Apr 1919, in
Dürnbach im Burgenland and killed in military action 21 Sep 1941, 1 km südw. Straßengabel Liza - Murmansk - Liza -
"Ura-Guba". I have his parents and genealogical path. The names/dates are so similar, and they lived in adjacent
villages. I have exhausted all my avenues and would be grateful if someone can help solve this piece of the
puzzle. Thank you so much.”
Member Daniel Marino is looking to collaborate with others researching Pöttsching.
If anyone has any information for Jan, Brien, or Daniel, please let me know and I will be happy to connect you
with them! You can reach me at HooftyRN@msn.com.
Until next time, stay safe and healthy! Enjoy the holiday season!
Vanessa
Update
for book "The Burgenländer Emigration to America": Here is this month's update on purchases of the English
issue of the 3rd edition of Dr. Walter Dujmovits' book "Die Amerika-Wanderung Der Burgenländer."
Current total sales are 1802 copies, as interested people purchased 6 books during this past month.
As always, the book is available for online purchase at a list price of $8.89
(which is the current production charge for the book, as we purposely choose not to make any profit so
you can obtain the book at as low a cost as possible!), plus tax & shipping. See the BB
homepage for a link to the information / ordering page.
Christmas is soon and the book is an excellent read for the Burgenländers in your family... so get theirs
now!
Burgenland Recipes: (none this month... got one for us?)
Note:
Our recipes sortable list has links directly to the recipes or food-related articles
published in our past newsletters. You can access the list by clicking our recipe box (to the right). Thanks to
the contributions of our members over the years, we have quite a collection of Burgenland recipes, some with
several variations.
However, whenever we use up our unpublished recipes, this recipe section will become dormant. So, if you have a
favorite family recipe, please consider sharing it with us. We will be happy to publish it. Our older relatives,
sadly, aren't with us forever, so don't allow your favorite ethnic dish to be lost to future generations.
You can send your recipe to BB Recipes Editor,
Alan Varga.
Thanks!
Words for Thought:
Please, please... I know some of you immediately got mad at me, thinking I published this to poke fun at
President-elect Trump... and others howled thinking it is so very appropriate, but my real purpose was to stir all
of you up by asking you to think about these words.
The author, Henry Louis Mencken (1880–1956) was an American journalist, essayist, satirist, and
cultural critic with a very combative rhetorical and prose style. He wrote this text in the build-up to the first
presidential election after WW-I, when a Democrat was in power (Woodrow Wilson) and a Republican sweep was likely
in the offing (Warren Harding essentially campaigned against Wilson—even though Wilson
was not the Democrat's candidate, James Cox was—by calling for a "return to normalcy"
and a rejection of Wilson's foreign and economic policies and the recession brought on by WW-I).
In truth, Mencken was an outspoken opponent of populism and representative democracy, which he viewed as a system
in which inferior men dominated their superiors and that he called "the worship of jackals by jackasses."
Larry S Gibson described Mencken as an elitist who believed that humans consisted of a small group of those of
superior intelligence and a mass of inferior people, so democracy made no sense to him. It was the system he
rejected in these words, not the electee... his words call the Office of the President "the inner soul of the
people" ...and that, to him, was objectionable!
|
3) HISTORICAL BB NEWSLETTER ARTICLES
Editor: This is part of our series designed to recycle interesting articles from the BB Newsletters of
10 years ago. This reprint defines Cisleitha and Transleitha, terms that were used to label the two main parts of
the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Interestingly, as I was prepping this, my wife asked me about Transnistria, an
unrecognized breakaway state in Moldova consisting mostly of the narrow strip of land between the Dniester river
and the Moldova–Ukraine border. It's name comes about via the same logic as Cisleitha and Transleitha... only the
river differs!
THE BURGENLAND BUNCH NEWS No. 249
November 30, 2014
CIS- VERSUS TRANS- LEITHA
Robert Chapman wrote to me with a question about the Leitha River. He was in Lébény, Hungary, after
two days in Gols, Burgenland, both visits as part of a European trip in early October. He commented that he had
driven to Gattendorf (Burgenland) "to view and photograph the Leitha River. So I have confirmed that Gols was
not Transleithana. However, I remain uncertain about Lébény, Hungary. With your vast knowledge of the area, might
you be able to tell me on which side of the Leitha is Lébény situated?"
I replied (in part): That’s an interesting question, Bob. The Leitha is relatively short,
starting 6 or 7 miles S-SW of Weiner Neustadt, becoming part of the border between the Lower Austria and
Burgenland from near Neufeld an der Leitha until just beyond Leithaprodersdorf, and then again between Bruck an
der Leitha and Gattendorf. It then cuts SE across the tip of Burgenland and goes into Hungary just northeast of
Nickelsdorf, where it becomes known as the Latja River. From there it flows southeast to Mosonmagyaróvár,
where it terminates and empties into the Moson arm of the Danube River. Lébény is another 10-15 miles further S-SE
of Mosonmagyaróvár.
Now, if you consider the Leitha mostly as a diagonal arc from SW to NE (i.e., ignoring its further run to
the SE beyond Gattendorf) it is a crude line dividing Vienna and old Austria (to its NW) and Budapest and old
Hungary (to its SE), which is the way geographers think of it when speaking of Cisleitha (Austria) versus
Transleitha (Hungary). In this sense, Lébény, being definitely to the SE of the arc, is “Beyond the
Leitha” (Trans) rather than “On this side of the Leitha” (Cis), at least from a Viennese
perspective.
By the way, by that same commonly-accepted notation, Gols is also Transleitha (as it was part of Hungary
until 1921 and is SE of the arc). You must have misspoke in your statement about Gols.
Bob replied (in part): For what it’s worth, I spent one night each in Györ and Mosonmagyaróvár. My
hotel in Mosonmagyaróvár, the Engler (quaint little place), is located on the bank of the “Little
Danube”. Curious that Gols is Transleitha since the town is definitely west of the Leitha River. The
river is even east of the M1.
I replied: The problem is that the Leitha River is more like a wide inverted U and
only the upper left and top part of it was the border… but that was the part that was nearest to Vienna so gave
the Cis--Trans divide its name. Burghardt in his book “The Political Geography of Burgenland,” says
“The river became the symbol of the boundary so that the two halves of the dual monarchy were often referred to
as Trans-Leitha (Hungary), and Cis-Leitha (Austria). The most cursory glance at the map reveals, however, that the
Leitha is by no means consistently the boundary; instead the line moves back and forth, with three departures
eastward from the stream. The Leitha carries the boundary for only three-fifths of the distance between Neudörfl
and Gattendorf. In the continuing border discord between Hungary and Lower Austria, the Leitha was not only a
symbol of the boundary, but also became a symbol of the discord concerning the placement of the line.”
In effect, the part of the river that is in current Burgenland and in Hungary had nothing to do with defining and
naming the boundary, so you should not determine East vs. West (Trans vs. Cis) by those portions.
Only the small part that was along the “Thousand Year Border” between Austria and Hungary (Neudörfl to
Gattendorf ) is informative… so forget that it also runs from Gattendorf to Mosonmagyarovar! Likewise, if you draw
a line between Vienna and Budapest, that line would cross the (old) border at the Leitha, thus the names.
By the way, the Leitha (Latja) dumps into the Little Danube about a half-mile straight
north of your hotel (a somewhat longer distance, though, if you follow city streets to there, as you’ll have to
work westward and then eastward around the bend in the Little Danube).
Some follow-up comments: The concept of Cis- vs. Trans-Leitha came into being
when the Austro-Hungarian Empire became the Dual Monarchy due to the Compromise of 1867.
Cisleitha (shown in pink in the image to the right) was the common but unofficial denotation for the
northern and western part of Austria-Hungary, i.e., for "Die im Reichsrat vertretenen Königreiche und Länder"
("The Kingdoms and Lands represented in the Imperial Council"), otherwise known as Austria, with a
population of about 20 million.
Transleitha (shown in green) was the term applied to the "Lands of the Holy Hungarian Crown of St
Stephen" (Hungarian: Szent István Koronájának Országai or A Magyar Szent Korona Országai; German:
Länder der Heiligen Ungarischen Stephanskrone), otherwise known as Hungary, with a population of about
15 million.
[Aside: The blue section was known as The Condominium of Bosnia and Herzegovina and was part of the
Ottoman Empire in 1867. However, it was occupied by Austria-Hungary in 1878 and formally annexed in 1908
and became a separate, third part of Austria-Hungary.]
For those interested in the details, the image below shows the constituent parts of Cis- and
Trans-Leitha in 1867, along with their capital cities; the associated text provides the key to the
numbered parts as well as, in square brackets [], the successor nation(s) they are part of now:
Cisleithania (Empire of Austria): 1. Bohemia [Czech Republic], 2. Bukovina [Romania,
Ukraine], 3. Carinthia [Austria, Italy, Slovenia], 4. Carniola [Slovenia], 5. Dalmatia [Croatia], 6. Galicia
[Poland, Ukraine], 7. Küstenland [Croatia, Italy, Slovenia], 8. Lower Austria [Austria, Czech Republic], 9.
Moravia [Czech Republic], 10. Salzburg [Austria], 11. Silesia [Czech Republic, Poland], 12. Styria [Austria,
Slovenia], 13. Tyrol [Austria, Italy], 14. Upper Austria [Austria], 15. Vorarlberg [Austria];
Transleithania (Kingdom of Hungary): 16. Hungary [Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, Austria, Serbia,
Ukraine, Slovenia, Poland], 17. Croatia-Slavonia [Croatia, Slovenia];
Austrian-Hungarian Condominium: 18. Bosnia and Herzegovina [Bosnia-Herzegovina].
In addition, four other entities are not shown in this map: A. Lombardy (below 15) and B. Venetia (below
13) were part of Cisleithania until transfer to Italy in 1859 and 1866; and C. the free city of Fiume [now
Rijeka, Croatia] and D. Hungary's Militaergrenze (Military Border) [to Croatia, Serbia and Romania in 1872]
were part of Transleithania.
It should be noted that the lands that became Burgenland were part of Transleithania, as they
were part of Hungary prior to their transfer to Austrian political control and the formation of Burgenland in
1921, which is also when its parent entity known as Austria-Hungary was deconstructed.
It should also be noted that, when your ancestors wrote "Austria" as their place of origin, they
could have been (correctly) referring to any of the 18 numbered entities in the above map (as well as the four
entities, A-D, not on the map). Likewise, a claim of "Hungary" could also refer to Croatia, Slavonia, the
Condominium, Fiume or the pre-1872 Militaergrenze, as well as Hungary itself. While it is feasible, it is
nonetheless unlikely that "Hungary" would have been used to refer to an entity in the Cisleitha half.
A slightly different presentation of the disposition of the Austro-Hungarian Dual Monarchy, one with modern
national boundaries, is shown below:
|
5) BURGENLAND EMIGRANT OBITUARIES
Anna Maria Klann (née Urban)
Anna Maria Klann (née
Urban), 81, of Schaumburg, Illinois, passed away peacefully at home on November 9th, 2024. Anna was born in
Dürnbach, Burgenland, Austria before moving to Switzerland, and finally Chicago in 1961. She worked for 39 years
at her beloved Lutheran General as an anesthesia aide. She loved her Lutheran General family, including her
"adopted son" Manny, his wife Jacky, and friend Darlene.
When we think of Anna, she is often remembered with her famous Christmas cookies that she shared with her family
and friends. With Anna, no one was a stranger for very long. She touched the lives of all those around her,
especially her neighbors who became family; Patty, Denise, Karl, Kanan, Parwin, Arihaan, Raj, Bubly, and many
others. She was a proud Oma, mother, sister, and friend. Anna had a passion for cooking and baking, especially
when it was for her loved ones. Her kitchen was a place of warmth and love, where she prepared many meals, enjoyed
time with family and friends, and read her newspaper. Her Catholic faith was a cornerstone of her life; her home
was always lit up by her special blessed mother candle. She also had a fondness for some simple things in life,
evident in her love for ice cream, french fries, flowers, and most recently, binge watching TV shows. Her legacy
of love, faith, and joy will be cherished by all who knew her.
She is survived by her daughter Lynda, her granddaughters, Elie and Mia, her brother Ludwig, and many more
extended family members that she cherished; Sabina, Jenny, Christopher, Ilona, Lindsey, Kristina, James,
Reinhardt, Katie, and Chris. She is predeceased by her husband Juergen, and her sisters, Erna and Betty.
To celebrate Anna's life, a visitation will be held on November 15th, 2024 from 4pm-8pm at Ahlgrim Funeral Home at
330 W Golf Rd in Schaumburg, IL. Funeral Mass will be held at St. Matthew's Catholic Church at 1001 E Schaumburg
Rd. in Schaumburg, IL on November 16th, 2024 at 10am. Luncheon to follow. The family would like to thank the
devoted staff at Christ Hospital, LVAD Clinic, and Lutheran General, as well as Advocate Hospice for their kind,
compassionate care. The family would also like to thank her guardian angel, Manny Gonzales for all of his
unwavering love and care he provided for 35 years.
William Giedl
William Giedl, 90, of
Allentown, Pennsylvania, passed away Wednesday, November 13, 2024. He was the husband of Marie (Wunderler) Giedl,
with whom he shared nearly 65 years of marriage this coming January.
Born in Pittsburgh and raised in Unterradling/Alsórönök, Hungary, he was the son of the late Joseph and Theresa
(Nickischer) Giedl.
He was a member of St. Francis of Assisi R. C. Church, Allentown. He was an Army veteran. Before retiring, he
worked for 43 years at Mack Trucks, and later for several years at the Lehigh Valley Auto Auction. He was the past
Vice President of the Austrian-Hungarian Veterans' Benefit Society in Allentown and an honorary member of the
Coplay Sängerbund, where he enjoyed polka dancing with his wife for many years. He was an avid Phillies fan.
Survivors: wife Marie; son, William and his wife Renee of Waycross, GA; daughter, Donna Bonawitz Holzer and her
husband Richard of Upper Macungie Twp; sister, Margaret Schuch of Jacksonville, FL; 3 grandchildren, MacKenna
Bonawitz and her fiancé Christopher Lawless, Chandler Giedl and his wife Hope, Lindsay Giedl. He was predeceased
by his brother Joseph.
Mass of Christian Burial: 10:00 AM, Tuesday, November 19 at St. Francis of Assisi R. C. Church, 1046 W. Cedar St.,
Allentown, PA 18102. Calling hour will begin at 9:00 AM. Burial to follow with military honors at St. Peter's R.
C. Church Cemetery, Coplay. Memorials can be considered to the church.
Mary Ann Provali (née Peischl)
Mary Ann Provali, 88, of
Regina, Canada, passed away peacefully at home with family by her side on Friday, September 27, 2024.
Born Maria Julianna Peischl in Heiligenkreuz, Austria on March 30, 1936 to Johann and Julianna Peischl, and came
to Canada alone at 16 in 1952. She was sponsored by her uncle and aunt, Frank and Mary Peischl. Once in Canada,
she changed her name to Mary Ann and learned to speak English, cook and bake, working in her aunt and uncle’s
business, Frank’s Café.
In 1956 she married Joseph Provali, and left the café to raise their children Ron (1959) and Jule (1965).
Mary Ann was a hard worker, quietly accepting whatever challenges came her way. After her children were grown, she
took full-time work at The Plains Hospital until it closed, then at the General and Pasqua Hospitals until
retirement. Widowed in 1983, Mary took over and looked after her home and yard well into her eighties. Always
fiercely independent, she preferred to do things herself! She was a wonderful baker and cook, an accomplished
seamstress, and kept an immaculate home and yard. She loved her flowers. Mary Ann was always helping a friend,
neighbor or family member, driving them to appointments, running errands and dropping them off at the airport,
especially after retirement. She took joy in visiting with her grandchildren, and often babysat them and had them
over to stay with her when they were older. She even had a couple of them live with her for a time. In later
years, she was always interested in what the great-grandchildren were up to and had a soft spot for all the
family’s dogs. She stayed in her own home, as she wished, until the end.
Mary Ann is survived by her son Ron (Michelle) Provali of Regina, SK; daughter Jule (Mark) Gilchrist of Regina,
SK; grandchildren Alexis Provali, Marci (Devin) Kress, Zack Provali, Heather Gilchrist and MacMillan Gilchrist;
great-grandchildren Camden Gustilo, Jake Kress, Kate Kress, and Maelyn Herle; her sister Waltraud Petzold of
Germany; as well as numerous nieces and nephews.
Memorial Service will take place at Speers Funeral Chapel, 2136 College Avenue, Regina, SK, on Wednesday, October
2, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. Interment will take place at Riverside Memorial Park at a later date.
|